richardpalinkas

Il try to drop the gap again and see what happens. I don't have a wideband on me so I'm not sure how rich. According to my fuel table should be 0.78 lambda. Could are original, 100k on the clock. These plugs would be lucky to be 2000k old. They look pretty good. No discoloring at all

Yea I seem to develop a miss only when the engine is hot, and only under high boost (18psi) on e85. By hot I mean after some hard driving for some time. No DTC are logged. Have replaced plugs in the past with bkr7e gapped to 0.7mm which seems to fix it for a few thousand KMs(2000kms) but eventually comes back. Just tried regapping standard iridiums today which seems to be driving ok. But obviously logging individual cylinder missfire would narrow it down a lot quicker

Can you log individual cylinder missfire on the FG falcons?

Sounds like it's flaring slightly

if i create a stock sprint calibration, those tables are the same as a 2009 xr6t (haedll8), but different to a 2008 g6e turbo (haedjr5). thinking maybe because its a 'sports' model compared to a luxury model

so more testing on this one this arvo, criteria combination table and table of allowed drive programs are causing the issue. strange because i created a stock file, and they are stock values according to my strategy code

What do these tables actually do?

Yea strange. My original file prior to being tuned has the same values for both of these tables. The car was tuned prior to me buying it so maybe something went wrong at some point

So I changed all the axis labels and they were fine. Seems to be a combination of sw version table and criteria combination table that affects the shift burble. Either one of these tables feels like the torque module switch is removed, very long drawn out shifts instead of nice quick firm shifts

Yea strange, both tune files work perfect in manual mode, just the burble seems to be affected by something within these last few tables.

im assuming that table relates to which shift tables are permissible, 0 being permissible and 1 being not permissible?

27 and 40 are the only difference, changing from 1-0

most of them are all 0, theres only a few that have a 1. 34-38 are all 0

all modes

Unless it has to do with the development arrays? I've only gone this far, I haven't gone any further in copying over other tables within the development parameters. That's the next step, to copy each one over to see if it's a single table or multiple tables causing the issue. Just thought I'd ask here first just incase I'm copying something I shouldn't

working not working

They are all back to standard. I literally flashed the car 10 times this Arvo copying the TCM bit by bit to find only the above tables to affect the shift burble.

I did change over all shift patterns from 0-48, and all 4 converter schedules to match that of an XR6 sprint

Shift pattern 34, 35, 36, 37, 38 Shift maps/ converter schedule 1, schedule 2

just to touch base on this. i have managed to resolve the issue, but not sure why or how. what i did was copy over a tcm file from a previous vehicle, and slowly added back in the new tcm tune. what i found was blocking it were these tables in zf workshop development parameters. now if i compare my stock tcm calibration to my tuned tcm, these tables are the same, however, the shift burble was working perfectly fine before the car was tuned. any insight as to what these tables actually do? the axis is pretty self explanatory, but the others, i would like to know more details. thanks in advance

Are those scalers available in professional as well?

received_2133355323583356.mp4

Maybe look at the open loop transition tables. See if that helps

Do you mean to just disable DFCO completely? I already have dfco disabled but I have not turned off the torque module switch, as in system switches.

I'm sure most tuners don't let their customers cars go out with retarded timing on decel, or running pig rich, but how are most tuners getting big flames like this?