Jump to content
PCMTEC Forums

Roland@pcmtec

Members
  • Content Count

    1,238
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    183

Roland@pcmtec last won the day on June 30

Roland@pcmtec had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,380 Excellent

3 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. These two will force a car into open loop as well. set auF2543 FUEL OVRD SWITCH to 1 make sure auF1545 FUEL OLCL SWITCH is set at 1
  2. Yeah so as he says WinOLS is really beyond 95% (or more) of tuners. Generating definitions from scratch is extremely time consuming. For example there are 165 operating systems from 2002 to 2016 in the Ford Falcon. Each of these has to be defined separately. We have written our own decompiler that pattern matches several calibration that we have defined by hand against all of the others, this makes the process much faster, but you still have to write the decompiler. There is probably 2 years full time work that went into just that one part of the software. Basically this job gets harder each year as PCMs get more complex, different security (and checksums) and they add more and more advanced algorithms and tables. The current 2018 Mustang for example has over 33,000 scalars and tables. This is a compilation of 100s of engineers work over 20+ years. It is not really possible for one (or even several) people to reverse engineer and understand all of this. Sure you can reverse engineer and define the tables, but how they all interact and work is incredibly complex. Even calibrators who work for large OEMs who have access to source code and calibration guides struggle to understand how a lot of it works at times. This is simply because of the vast amount of code that needs to be understood. Often you'll have a full team of engineers, each working on calibrating only one part of the PCM, they often don't understand what the other ones are doing as they don't have the time to learn everything.
  3. It is likely going straight to the base fuel map and not using the cold start map. You could try increasing the temperature that the cold start map is used at.
  4. Turned off long term fuel trims entirely and see if it still happens Will
  5. Figure out exactly what coolant temp it is at when you do a hot start. Then massively enrichen that part of the cranking lambda table. If it still doesn't start then you have a mechanical fueling related issue. The PCM already takes into account a heat soaked fuel rail and compensates for it on startup. You could also try pulling your fuel rail out and checking it is spraying when hot.
  6. Anything else like this please post a bug report as well. Often people have issues for months and we are unaware they exist as no one tells us. The more information you guys give us the better!
  7. There is an arbitrary limit of 8 at the moment, only because no one has logged more than 1 input to date.
  8. Can you explain a bit more for the default for log save? You can already select "open new items in a new window". We don't persist this item as lots of people were turning it on and not knowing how to turn it off again clogging up support requests. Is that what you mean by default?
  9. It sounds like it is saving in raw mode, I'll confirm what is going on there. Raw mode only saves only the real values, not interpolated values. Depending on what you have logged there can be a 1 second delay between packets depending on how many items you are logging. Everything else is "made up". Depending on what you are doing this is better as you know only real data has been logged and not made up interpolated values. If you want to ensure high poll rate right click and select "high priority" on important items. Up to 15 items can be logged on high priority which is roughly 50ms update rates. Certain common parameters like rpm and temperature are broadcast and will always be logged at a high rate as well. Everything else will be poll based and depend on the number of parameters ticked as to the rate at which they update.
  10. It is listed above in the post by darryl. Map intercept at zero aircharge is the one you want. The intercept is the c part of the y=mx+c equation, otherwise known as an offset.
  11. I like it. I'll put it on the list.
  12. Set up everything required for flat shifting then you can set your limiter where ever you want. Using the multi tune with launch control is MUCH more flexible though as you can simply set the main spark map to -30 etc. It is super easy to do if you follow the guide.
  13. Currently there is no ability to cut spark from the factory PCM. We have played with a few methods however we found a fuel dump/spark retard coupled with a injector cut out to be the safest and most effective way to limit engine speed. Likely this video is using an aftermarket 2-step or it is just a very aggressive spark retard coupled with fuel dump (will make huge pops and bangs).
  14. There would be no return on investment for us to build such a tool unfortunately. Forscan, IDS, FDRS etc all do these tasks much better than we ever will and support thousands of cars for a tiny price. The Falcon ZF is the only TCM that Ford never released a tool for. To build, test, QA and release a product like that (which would only support a now extinct model of car, the Falcon) would end up costing us close to $100k in development, not only that but we would lose 3 months of development time on our flagship products (the multi tune etc). We would sell maybe 100 copies of the software and I doubt anyone would pay more than $300 for it. There are a lot of things we would like to do, but we have to say no to about 90% of them as we would end up building 50 tools poorly instead of 1 extremely well. You can see why the high end scantools cost thousands of dollars a year in subscription fees, it is a huge amount of work to build and maintain even simple products. So if not many people use them, you have to charge a lot of money to make it anything other than a money losing exercise. Where as with something like a tuning product that people use daily and are willing to spend $150-$500 per car in licensing fees, you can suddenly dedicate several full time staff to polishing and constantly improving the tools for multiple years.
×
×
  • Create New...