David07 Posted August 2, 2019 Posted August 2, 2019 I'm looking at buying an XR6T as a daily but with the price of fuel sky rocketing, I'm wondering whether it's at all possible to run a setup where you can simulate the conditions of an N/A Barra running on 91 octane fuel? Then by using a duel map setup could you program the ecu to run an extremely fuel efficient 91 tune on very low boost but then also have a 98 tune built in running stock power & stock boost? I know 91 octane fuel should never be the fuel of choice for a turbo set up but these are hard times. Quote
finnigan001 Posted August 2, 2019 Posted August 2, 2019 Yeh definitely possible. You would have to retard the spark to find where the engine is happy on 91. I would go the other way personally. Have a tune on 98 that is super efficient/low boost and have a switch wired for the custom tune that you could flick for high power 98. 98RON has more energy than 91RON and theoretically should give you more mileage for the same amount of fuel. You would need to work out if better mileage works out with the price difference. however coupled with more spark low down(slightly more resistant to knock) for torque and lower boost(less air/less fuel burnt) could be a cool experiment to find out real world results. Quote
Roland@pcmtec Posted August 5, 2019 Posted August 5, 2019 They already have this functionality built in from the factory. Search for "octane" in the software and you can find all the knock thresholds to switch on/off the octane adder tables. This is one of them. Or you can go down the multi tune route, then you can do two completely different tunes. Quote
apoc Posted August 7, 2019 Posted August 7, 2019 I use the octane *sensing* spark reductions for my N/A barra patrol, from 98 to 91. Works well. Not sure how much I'd trust it on a turbo though Quote
Roland@pcmtec Posted August 7, 2019 Posted August 7, 2019 I believe Ford didn't trust it either. From what I can see no turbo car has it enabled by default. Quote
Nigel Posted August 16, 2019 Posted August 16, 2019 Roland thats interesting. When I had an FG Turbo, I was quite surprised at how poorly it would run on 98. There was an interesting Engine Roughness which just wasnt there on 95. Did Ford just tune for 95? - or even 91 on the turbos? - Mine certainly ran well on all fuels. I ended up going with 95, and the odd half a tank of 98, always BP Quote
Darryl@pcmtec Posted August 16, 2019 Posted August 16, 2019 Pretty sure Ford tuned for 95 and up to 10% ethanol as well, putting in better petrol allows for more power but there are still places in Australia where you cannot buy 98 at all. The autooctane setting most tuners turn it off because they tell their customers it is tuned for 98, putting 95/91 octane in their tuned vehicle would lead to disaster. Quote
Roland@pcmtec Posted August 16, 2019 Posted August 16, 2019 I'm not sure what fuel they tuned on, it does have a base octane number but I'm not sure if this is accurate. Quote
Darryl@pcmtec Posted August 16, 2019 Posted August 16, 2019 base octane is correct but I think it is US specification. Quote
fordsrule Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Just having a brief read of this topic, do i understand correctly, it's saying that the turning on or off of the "switch" in octane allows the use of 98 or 95 with no further changes? Cheers Quote
Roland@pcmtec Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 21 minutes ago, fordsrule said: Just having a brief read of this topic, do i understand correctly, it's saying that the turning on or off of the "switch" in octane allows the use of 98 or 95 with no further changes? Cheers It isn't magic. There is a spark adder (or subtractor) table which adds spark across the board. By default it is either 0 or subtracts 4 degrees. When it is turned on I believe the car was tuned with 95 octane, so when it detects enough knock it assumes 91 octane and pulls 4 degrees from the whole map. This logic is only turned on for the NA vehicles. You can set anything you want in this map though, and enable it on a turbo, not that I would recommend it but it is an option. These numbers are not necessarily true or accurate. 1 Quote
fordsrule Posted August 19, 2019 Posted August 19, 2019 Thanks for the reply, it's an interesting topic. Steve Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.