Loki Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Hi, Can some one share with me why we have 60 degree area in the table like that? How do we predict or command the exact spark for a specific cell (Load, RPM)? For example, I am still in the blind to work out how I get 55 degree at 1500RPM for cruise. I am trying to target 45-50 for that area but have no confidence where or how to make changes to the tables. Regards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland@pcmtec Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 Hi Loki the spark algorithms are far more complex than simply Load vs Rpm. The final commanded spark is a combination of multiple tables. This is not an exhaustive list however this is the ones you need to look at. Borderline Knock - auF16593 (this is the maximum spark before the engine will knock) MBT Spark - auF16630 (this is the maximum spark before you stop increasing torque) Coolant temp MBT adjustment - auF2433 Spark ECT Correction - auF0222 This retards timing when your coolant temp gets too hot ECT Correction Multiplier - auF0223 This is a multiplier for the above table. Spark IAT Correction - auF0220 This retards timing when your intake air temp gets too hot IAT Correction Multiplier - auF0221 This is a multiplier for the above table. Spark BLK table adder (lambda correction) - auF0218 - This adds or subtracts timing based on the commanded lambda. This one will catch you out, it makes quite large adjustments based on your commanded lambda, a lot of people zero out the positive numbers in this table. Steady state/cruise This is an approximation of the calculation for when driving under normal circumstances without cold start or deacceleration active. It is an esimation, at some stage we want to make a proper write up on this from exactly what is in the assembly code. This is possibly incorrect or has omissions, so please take this into account. If anyone knows more detail than this please post up any corrections. Final Spark = Math.Min(auF16593, auF16630-auF2433) + auF0218 + auF0223 * auF0222 + auF0220 * auF0221 Or Final Spark = Minimum(BLK, MBT-MBT adjustment) + lambda correction + IAT Correction + ECT Correction. IDLE Now if you are at idle it uses a PID loop to control spark. Deacceleration If you are deaccelerating (eg closed throttle) it uses auF0228 (Decel Spark Angle) Cold Start If you are on cold start it uses the following: Maximum Cold Start auF0210 Maximum Cold Start Adder auF0212 Maximum Cold Start Adder #2 auF0211 Cold Start Spark = auF0210 + auF0212 + auF0211 Final Cold Start Spark = Math.Min(Cold Start Spark, BLK, MBT-MBT Adjustment) (eg whichever is smaller of the 3 numbers) Transient conditions This is when changing the rate of acceleration, eg a change in the rate of load (the derivative of load). For example accelerating slowly, then flattening the throttle. Spark Retard for Tip-In auF0233 Tip in detonation control auF1705 Final Spark Transient = Final Spark (from the above calculation) + auF0233 * auF1705 Torque Control There are various times the PCM will command torque reduction which is achieved by ignition retard and in some conditions ETC (throttle feathering/closing). This is under traction control, changing gears in an automatic etc. Spark Retard (torque ratio) auF0263 Going forward we would like to build a spark simulator. Eg you enter in RPM, Load, IAT and ECT with sliders and you can see what the final spark will likely be, for now you would need to fill out these equations in excel by hand. If you do build anything feel free to post it up, it will be very helpful for others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loki Posted December 7, 2017 Author Share Posted December 7, 2017 Oh dear :-) Yea I have some idea about all those adders and multipliers but my ghosh! I love your reply Roland, and the formula given so I could use Excel to do some rough calculation. Simulation would be great. Thank you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland@pcmtec Posted December 7, 2017 Share Posted December 7, 2017 No problem, it is a bit daunting at first but you will see that you can simplify things quite a bit. A lot of people start by zeroing the lambda correction table and setting BLK and MBT to be equal. They also zero the positive numbers in the IAT and ECT tables, this way what you see in BLK is what you get and only once the motor gets hot do the IAT and ECT tables kick in and start pulling timing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryl@pcmtec Posted December 8, 2017 Share Posted December 8, 2017 Loki, one thing to remember about IDLE is that spark is one of the things the PCM uses to control IDLE. For example if IDLE RPM is dropping it will increase spark angle to get it back to the target. This is simplifying it quite a bit but as you say noted your idle spark was moving and it would be interesting to see if the RPM moving as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richardpalinkas Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 how conservative are the stock ignition timing maps for increasing boost? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland@pcmtec Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 They will ping standard with no changes. The knock retard is quite heavy though so you can double the boost, it will knock and then it will pull up to 14 degrees of timing for you automatically. Absolutely wouldn't recommend you tune like this but some people do and the cars will survive for longer than you think. Have a look at some tuned cars. They will run quite low timing at peak torque. So to answer your quest they aren't conservative at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richardpalinkas Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 any chance of posting some files to compare? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richardpalinkas Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 what kind of timing at wot are people getting on their fg xr6 turbos? has all supporting mods, gtx turbo, full exhaust and injectors to suit. was logging some data today and was seeing around 7-8 degrees. not sure if this could come up a bit. no obvious knocking can be heard. running around 16psi, 500rwhp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland@pcmtec Posted February 11, 2018 Share Posted February 11, 2018 We don't have any other DEMO files, you will need the full version to view other tunes. If you compare the xr6 sprint, f6 vs non f6 etc you will get an idea of the timing changes ford makes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.