mondc95ba
-
Posts
7 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by mondc95ba
-
-
Hi All,
Is there any way of controlling the aggressiveness of cruise control. I have found that a heavier car in a higher gear tends to get on boost and ramp up to the desired speed quicker when already at the designated speed. (i.e Up a hill, on boost to maintain and then off boost as speed increase above set speed, repeating in a feedback loop)
When resuming cruise it tends to be steady and ramp up to speed at a fixed rate.
Is there any PID controlling variables that directly affects the at speed maintaining of speed, is there a torque variable I can limit.
- 1
-
Filtering through the knowledge base here.
In Regards to the Ba F6 strategy but disabling the F6 sender to be the stock standard 0.6bar Ba Oil Pressure Switch. As recommended when converting to the independent VCT.
Can the F6 resistive sender (or any sender with the same resistive range) be used in place of the BA Open/Closed Switch? and will it show the pressure whilst logging in pcmtec?
Or is the F6 sender actually a 2 in 1, where the sender (resistive feedback) is for the factory centre pod gauge and the other portion is the switch for the low oil open/closed switching at the ECU?
Would be nice to be able to implement logging into the ecu for a resistive sender...
-
16 hours ago, BeerTurbo said:
did you change any settings? I'm about to put a fg throttle one mine and comparing things that seem vastly different are :
AUF0077 - Convert pedal position to des ETC angle
AUF0083 Desired throttle angle as per pedal position
AUF0084 b as above
couple of smaller things like throttle count wide open etc are marginally different
No changes here mate, plug and play really.
I haven't looked at these settings myself, but if the table axis are the same i'd assume you'd just have to copy the FG tables to the BA if you want the "feel" of an FG throttle.Stepper motors are controlled very similarly, just the nature of how snappy and responsive they feel is different between models.
Happy to be corrected if I am wrong on this.
-
Made my own harness for next to nothing and can confirm it works.
Now to make the adapter plate with countersunk screws to have it reach the same thickness as a BA\BF throttle body anyway.🤦♂️
- 1
-
Before I go searching through I/O Diagrams for the FG/BF/BA Throttle Body and Part information has anyone converted a FG Throttle Body to work on a BA/BF ECU/PCM?
If so, can you post up a how-to and what is required additionally software side to calibrate for voltage ranges (if they change), stepper motor PWN changes, etc. -
Cruise Control Aggressiveness
in Engine Tuning (AUS)
Posted · Edited by mondc95ba
Thanks Roland,
Appreciate the response. I have indeed changed my CD, by that I am guessing you mean car dynamics. It is a barra patrol.
Appears all of the parameters you have suggested changing are workshop edition parameters, I only have the professional extent of the licence. Sounds like auF10188 or auF12551 would be the ideal parameters to alter.
I currently have to operate the car with only 4 gears as the 5th gear has spun on the spline, removed the gear set and shift fork. So with the diff ratio I have at the moment, the car is cruising at 3k at 110km/h this is the problem area and demands the most torque for the speed. God knows how much fuel it consumes repeatedly accelerating also.
at 80km/h the feedback loop isn't as aggressive or I probably don't notice as much because it can't get into boost as easier.
Torque limiting with auF11568 to the torque figure achieved at 80km/h sounds like the way to go. Then it will flatline all the way upto 110km/h.
auF12551 sounds like an alternative to torque limiting but done similar to throttle restricting. Changing it to a more comfortable acceleration rate 4kph increment in 5 seconds i.e 0.8kph.s