boostedfalcon Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 On 3/26/2021 at 5:26 PM, Bill said: You'll find the speed source setting is incorrect in the PCM for the vehicle. The BA uses 2 different ABS systems. The first is a 3 channel system for ABS equipped vehicles & a 4 channel system for ABS/TCS equipped vehicles. I wouldn't expect that the calibrations would be in any way compatible which rules FORScan out as an option for fixing your issue. I believe you'll have 3 options.....I'd go with option 2 if you have the original PCM Option 1. licence the PCM & change the speed source setting to match the original PCM.....there may still be other differences in the calibration that may cause problems Option 2. See below....HOWTO: PCM Replacement Option 3. change the ABS module to suit the pcm. You'd also need to confirm there are no body wiring loom differences, brake master cylinder is the same etc. any feedback on the fix for this one? i have the same issue, fitted a turbo pcm to my n/a ba xr6 with abs but without traction control. no abs faults but i cannot get the speedo to work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 11 hours ago, boostedfalcon said: any feedback on the fix for this one? i have the same issue, fitted a turbo pcm to my n/a ba xr6 with abs but without traction control. no abs faults but i cannot get the speedo to work. Have you looked at the speed source on the original BA na PCM? It will tell you what it needs to be. BA's with ABS/TCS will need the speed source set to ABS via CAN BA's with ABS only, will need the speed source set to ABS via wire BA's with gearbox transducer (no ABS) will need the speed source set to Hall Effect Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boostedfalcon Posted January 11, 2022 Share Posted January 11, 2022 On 1/10/2022 at 8:00 AM, Bill said: Have you looked at the speed source on the original BA na PCM? It will tell you what it needs to be. BA's with ABS/TCS will need the speed source set to ABS via CAN BA's with ABS only, will need the speed source set to ABS via wire BA's with gearbox transducer (no ABS) will need the speed source set to Hall Effect thanks Bill ABS only, will need the speed source set to ABS via wire (this sorted it) very much appreciated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland@pcmtec Posted January 29, 2022 Author Share Posted January 29, 2022 Some good info here https://www.tiperformance.com.au/knowledge-base/programming-the-fg-falcon-abs-module-for-a-turbo-conversion/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakka351 Posted January 29, 2022 Share Posted January 29, 2022 Classssssic NIGEL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bushy0001 Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 Hey guys , can someone just correct me if I'm wrong please , but I have a bf mk2 turbo the abs module died so I got another one the pump numbers match so I took the module off it and put it in , to program it do I just hook the old one up save the data off it and load it onto the replacement? Is that correct ? As it's booked in to get done but that's next week if I can get it done I can race this weekend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted June 29, 2022 Share Posted June 29, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, Bushy0001 said: Hey guys , can someone just correct me if I'm wrong please , but I have a bf mk2 turbo the abs module died so I got another one the pump numbers match so I took the module off it and put it in , to program it do I just hook the old one up save the data off it and load it onto the replacement? Is that correct ? As it's booked in to get done but that's next week if I can get it done I can race this weekend. I’ve recently found a couple where the pump numbers have matched but the programming has been different & doesn’t have the turbo As-Built or turbo variants. They also won’t accept the turbo As-Built. If you can check the donor vehicle TearTag of the vehicle, you’ll need to match one of the numbers below to know you can then change variant if it doesn’t match eg XR6T or XR8 ute TearTag will show 09 02 04…..highlighted line in image. Edited June 29, 2022 by Bill 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunerman Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 On 6/30/2022 at 8:10 AM, Bill said: I’ve recently found a couple where the pump numbers have matched but the programming has been different & doesn’t have the turbo As-Built or turbo variants. They also won’t accept the turbo As-Built. If you can check the donor vehicle TearTag of the vehicle, you’ll need to match one of the numbers below to know you can then change variant if it doesn’t match eg XR6T or XR8 ute TearTag will show 09 02 04…..highlighted line in image. I don’t see any turbo ones. Does that mean it’s not a turbo abs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Tunerman said: I don’t see any turbo ones. Does that mean it’s not a turbo abs? That's correct. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunerman Posted July 1, 2022 Share Posted July 1, 2022 1 minute ago, Bill said: That's correct. Thanks a lot. I’m gonna have to find one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby@PCMTec Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 So we had an interesting ABS issue come up recently with two sperate cars. Basically there appears to be a FG build in the wild which what I would call a "Police Special". Apart from the normal police enables, this has a very particular strategy and ABS config. 1) The engine is a 'normal' FG engine build 2) ABS is set to F6 / Force 6 - 4Pot (19-01-01) 3) Unclear if the car was fit with the larger 4-pot or not at build time. 4) Strategy is HAEDLG7 - we have only ever seen it on these "ex police" vehicles. Problem being is that this particular strategy also needed the upgrade to the HAAE4 strategy for our CustomOS. When you did this - the ABS would fault. Essentially the ABS then became aware that the car was not using a F6 Strategy (or in this case, this special police hybrid). The upgrade to a F6 strategy was off the cards due to the engine differences (engine, turbo, injectors) without a whole bunch of time spent copying parameters and giving it a run on the dyno to be sure. So how do you fix it? The first option is to reset the ABS unit to the standard XR6T variant (19-06-01), but if you are running the larger brakes (4pot or 6pot) this is not ideal because it will not be using the appropriate ABS calibration for that package, additionally this requires FORSCAN and knowledge on how to use it. Second option is to figure out how the ABS knew that the PCM was not a "F6" PCM. We knew this was being communicated from the PCM somehow, but we had yet to identify a parameter in the PCM (if any) which was identifying this difference. Well due to the excellent work of @jakka351 and some time spent comparing stock files in PCMTec, we landed on the following information: - In the engine configuration frame that is sent on CAN, along with cylinder count, displacement, also contains a "peak engine torque" value. - Some anecdotal information said that for a Ford this value was always 0x82, and for a FPV this value was always a 0x8A - Doing some in-depth compares between known F6 strategies and normal strategies as well as the information on this CAN message led us to the parameter : auF12105: "Engine peak torque for SCP". This is a development parameter, and therefore only in Workshop Edition. Current Understanding is as Follows: Essentially this parameter is "130" (0x82) on all normal strategies - be it I6, V8 or otherwise. and "138" (0x8A) on all the F6 / FPV strategies. The name and allocation in the CAN frame is a misnomer, its not actually peak torque value. (I will look at renaming this in our database in the future for clarity.) When we set this value to 138 in the normal strategy with the F6 ABS, the error was cleared and we were able to proceed with MultiTune on the car, without having to change the ABS setting back to XR6T. Why is this important? Well first off it shows us the value of some of these development parameters that we continue to explore and learn about, but more importantly, it means that if you are doing a brake upgrade on a non-FPV car, you can now run the ABS in the correct setting for that brake package and ensure you don't get any warning lights / ABS no bueno. Cheers 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakka351 Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 Excellent write up Kirby. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roland@pcmtec Posted October 27, 2022 Author Share Posted October 27, 2022 This is sent on can message 0x623 for reference if that is of any interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 Excellent write up Kirby & great work Jakka. I'll have to have a look at this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 @Kirby@PCMTec @Roland@pcmtec auF12105: "Engine peak torque for SCP" could be another handy parameter to add to the Calibration List....when time permits Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby@PCMTec Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, Bill said: @Kirby@PCMTec @Roland@pcmtec auF12105: "Engine peak torque for SCP" could be another handy parameter to add to the Calibration List....when time permits Yeah I already have renamed it and updated the description. Next time there is an update it will be under "Miscellaneous" in the editor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakka351 Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 Should also give credit to user @TheReaper who spent a significant amount of time decoding the HS-CAN on the FG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 15 minutes ago, Kirby@PCMTec said: Yeah I already have renamed it and updated the description. Next time there is an update it will be under "Miscellaneous" in the editor. Cool, it'll be easier to find there & having it added into the "Calibration list" will also make it easier to filter strategies with the desired value if needed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjtrbo Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 To all involved, massive respect for your efforts and especially for sharing. Bloody great work 🤙 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakka351 Posted October 27, 2022 Share Posted October 27, 2022 It may be a thing to also point put that there may be many cars out there that are running the wrong ABS config for the set up they have - Using mine as an example a mk1 GS (stock config Xr8), running the GT Boss 315 strategy had only been possible by setting the ABS to GT 4 Pot brake config - Wrong for the brakes on the vehicle, meaning the ABS may not be functioning at its optimum level. I do not know if this can effect stopping distance in an hard braking condition when the ABS become active. Will post further information on how editing PCM side parameters can allow the correct ABS configuration to work with the desired strategy. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakka351 Posted November 8, 2022 Share Posted November 8, 2022 Small Update: Parameters auF1718, auF2552, auF2531, auF12105 control the data which is sent on CAN ID 0x623 bytes 0-3 respectively(0 being the first byte). I am still mapping the rest, and as for how this can be used in practice to match ABS Config to PCM Strategy, the end goal would be to have the ABS configured as per the physical setup on the vehicle, so Xr6 NA should really be set to Xr6 NA Configuration in the ABS module, but to have that work with an Xr6 Turbo Strategy/PCM the above is likely what the ABS module reads before deciding if it is good to operate or if it will go into fault mode. I suspect that on the same makes the ABS module and pump hardware is all the same, this makes sense from the point of the manufacturer, however there is a lot of different hardware between BA/BF/FG/FGII/FG-X as well as 3 different diagnostic protocols. This means that in theory, as long as you can tell the ABS module the right data you should be able to match the correct ABS config for the vehicle setup to any PCM strategy. More to come. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted November 8, 2022 Share Posted November 8, 2022 1 hour ago, jakka351 said: Small Update: Parameters auF1718, auF2552, auF2531, auF12105 control the data which is sent on CAN ID 0x623 bytes 0-3 respectively(0 being the first byte). I am still mapping the rest, and as for how this can be used in practice to match ABS Config to PCM Strategy, the end goal would be to have the ABS configured as per the physical setup on the vehicle, so Xr6 NA should really be set to Xr6 NA Configuration in the ABS module, but to have that work with an Xr6 Turbo Strategy/PCM the above is likely what the ABS module reads before deciding if it is good to operate or if it will go into fault mode. I suspect that on the same makes the ABS module and pump hardware is all the same, this makes sense from the point of the manufacturer, however there is a lot of different hardware between BA/BF/FG/FGII/FG-X as well as 3 different diagnostic protocols. This means that in theory, as long as you can tell the ABS module the right data you should be able to match the correct ABS config for the vehicle setup to any PCM strategy. More to come. Great info again Jakka. You've likely already worked out the rest of the description for auF2552 but in case you haven't, others are interested or @PCMTEC wish to update the description, auF2552 "Calibration of Engine Cylinders and Valves for SCP. CAl as (NUMCYL * 8 + (Number of valves) 6 cyl is 6x8+4=52 V8 3v is 8x8+3=67 V8 4v is 8x8+4-68 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakka351 Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 Does anyone ever pull the VIN off of the ABS module when these issues are happening? I see that FORScan does not appear to be able to do it. However it is there in the As Built in block 0. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted November 28, 2022 Share Posted November 28, 2022 3 hours ago, jakka351 said: Does anyone ever pull the VIN off of the ABS module when these issues are happening? I see that FORScan does not appear to be able to do it. However it is there in the As Built in block 0. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm I've never given it a thought. I've swapped ABS modules in BA & BF without needing to change VIN. I haven't had to swap one in FG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Posted July 10, 2023 Share Posted July 10, 2023 (edited) On 10/27/2022 at 2:37 PM, Kirby@PCMTec said: So we had an interesting ABS issue come up recently with two sperate cars. Basically there appears to be a FG build in the wild which what I would call a "Police Special". Apart from the normal police enables, this has a very particular strategy and ABS config. 1) The engine is a 'normal' FG engine build 2) ABS is set to F6 / Force 6 - 4Pot (19-01-01) 3) Unclear if the car was fit with the larger 4-pot or not at build time. 4) Strategy is HAEDLG7 - we have only ever seen it on these "ex police" vehicles. Problem being is that this particular strategy also needed the upgrade to the HAAE4 strategy for our CustomOS. When you did this - the ABS would fault. Essentially the ABS then became aware that the car was not using a F6 Strategy (or in this case, this special police hybrid). The upgrade to a F6 strategy was off the cards due to the engine differences (engine, turbo, injectors) without a whole bunch of time spent copying parameters and giving it a run on the dyno to be sure. So how do you fix it? The first option is to reset the ABS unit to the standard XR6T variant (19-06-01), but if you are running the larger brakes (4pot or 6pot) this is not ideal because it will not be using the appropriate ABS calibration for that package, additionally this requires FORSCAN and knowledge on how to use it. Second option is to figure out how the ABS knew that the PCM was not a "F6" PCM. We knew this was being communicated from the PCM somehow, but we had yet to identify a parameter in the PCM (if any) which was identifying this difference. Well due to the excellent work of @jakka351 and some time spent comparing stock files in PCMTec, we landed on the following information: - In the engine configuration frame that is sent on CAN, along with cylinder count, displacement, also contains a "peak engine torque" value. - Some anecdotal information said that for a Ford this value was always 0x82, and for a FPV this value was always a 0x8A - Doing some in-depth compares between known F6 strategies and normal strategies as well as the information on this CAN message led us to the parameter : auF12105: "Engine peak torque for SCP". This is a development parameter, and therefore only in Workshop Edition. Current Understanding is as Follows: Essentially this parameter is "130" (0x82) on all normal strategies - be it I6, V8 or otherwise. and "138" (0x8A) on all the F6 / FPV strategies. The name and allocation in the CAN frame is a misnomer, its not actually peak torque value. (I will look at renaming this in our database in the future for clarity.) When we set this value to 138 in the normal strategy with the F6 ABS, the error was cleared and we were able to proceed with MultiTune on the car, without having to change the ABS setting back to XR6T. Why is this important? Well first off it shows us the value of some of these development parameters that we continue to explore and learn about, but more importantly, it means that if you are doing a brake upgrade on a non-FPV car, you can now run the ABS in the correct setting for that brake package and ensure you don't get any warning lights / ABS no bueno. Cheers @Kirby@PCMTec an update for auF12105 The values for auF12105, shown at the far right for (Ford/FPV Switch)130=FG XR6T, BF & FG V8 FPV.138=BF, F6X & FG 4.0 FPV. The auF12105 values I've found for other variants are as per below which isn't correctly reflected in the parameter description auF12105 isn't found when searched in FGX Sprint UEAA or UEAB. I wasn't able to find a BF manual 3V file but could have missed one when filtering. Edited July 27, 2023 by Bill 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hipcrostino Posted June 2 Share Posted June 2 I can confirm that an ABS unit for an BF XR6 sedan set to 09,02,04 for the turbo needs auF12105 to be set to 120. This got the ABS happy for me. If you use 98 for a non turbo, you also need to set auF2531 to 0x12 (non turbo) instead of 0x22 to be happy. However the ZF trans won't be, so it must check the auF2531 value as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.